Yay! I’m Standing!

That isn’t to imply that I have been unable to stand upright until this moment. The title is misleading. The difference is that I am testing the concept of a standing desk, and I am blogging at it right now. With my sad sack folding banquet table desk and patio chair combination, I really couldn’t have a less ergonomic setup, so I did what the internet told me to and set up a standing desk. Okay, so I have been considering it for a while, though not very seriously, so the recent articles I read about standing versus sitting and the toll that my sedentary life  is taking on me just pushed me into action. Hopefully I don’t end up with a sore back and feet, but my normal routine gives me a sore back and numb tongue (neck muscle pressing slightly on a nerve, not a stroke. Thanks for worrying) so there’s nothing to lose.

On to other things. I was tangentially involved in a twitter-based political conflict today. You didn’t know I was on twitter? Well I didn’t tell you, but now you know. My username is @spankules. It’s pronounced like Hercules, but with spanking, which is totally misleading since I don’t involve myself in any spanking at any time, whether for correction or amusement. Anyway. A chum of mine was questioning a campaign worker about something, and asking him to give an exact number. The worker refused and things got testy.  In response to a short-tempered tweet, my chum asked the fellow if he would want his son to behave the same way in a similar situation. The worker went into a rage, mistakenly thinking his family and his parenting skills were being questioned. It’s the first time that I’ve seen a collision between someone’s political efforts and their personal life.

Doing a little research into the angry man, I found some helpful information, most importantly the fact that he has a 7 month old baby at home. I remember the lack of emotional control and rationality I had at that phase in my little dude’s life, so I suspect baby stress fueled his anger. Plus, a stressed dad is always worried about defending his  family, and he might  start to see threats where there aren’t any.I know I still feel like I’ve let the team down if someone speaks rudely to my wife  or child when I’m not around (I’m looking at you, angry rude man at No Frills!), so I can understand where the campaign worker was coming from.

It also doesn’t help that the worker is aligned with a party that has put a lot of effort into being uncommunicative and aloof. People are so desperate to get answers from the party that they get pretty…enthusiastic when somebody actually responds. And since the unlucky few party members who are still willing to be open and communicative are forced to defend their party’s fabrications and unethical actions, they probably feel like their on the bottom of  a dog pile. There’s nothing worse than being a good guy with an unscrupulous autocratic boss. But for this specific twitter conflict, everybody calmed down and apologized, so no harm done.

I am not a Computer Scientist

Also, I am not an expert in the subject of Artificial Intelligence, but I won’t let my ignorance stop me. There is one element of the human intellect that will probably get missed by the people working on AI. This facet of human decision-making is, despite all appearances, vital to the function of our big big brains. I call this element ‘the self-destruct compulsion’. It’s not a catchy name, but I just made it up and I’m tired from the gym, so you do better if you’re so smart.

This is more than taking a risk on a course of action that has a very low chance of success. No, this is the urge that every human being has to occasionally make the worst choice possible on purpose, just to see what happens. To paraphrase Alfred from The Dark Knight, sometimes we just want to watch the world burn.

If you’re a parent, you have seen your child engage this part of their logic. They look you straight in the eyes, with a fixed glare of determination, and they haul off and punch you (or pinch or kick or whatever the most verboten action is at the time). They know it’s a bad choice, they know it’s against the rules, but they do it anyway. It’s an exploration of boundaries, but it’s also a way to test how you recover from a terrible choice.

On a bigger scale, I suspect this urge sometime rises to the surface during election time. the tea party in America is a prime example of people voting for disaster. They want to see how bad it can really get, when you reject fact and logic and just barrel ahead with your hands off of the wheel. I’m worried that the election here is going in the same direction. The guy who is currently winning (according to the polls) is really running on an anti-government platform, because he seems to hate the political process more than anyone. Strangely, he’s capitalizing on the anti-politician sentiment by re-enforcing the stereotype of ‘all politicians are crooked’. It’s a shame, because there are so many good and honest people running for office, and I hate to see them painted with the same hateful brush. (Can a brush be hateful?)

So this compulsion to occasionally be your own worst enemy is a big part of our learning process. Learning to recover from catastrophe is a vital skill for evolutionary survival, so we make sure to keep practicing by making our own messes to clean up. Hopefully we can, as a species, stay one step ahead of our ability to make a mess, so we don’t create a disaster that is unrecoverable. And we won’t see a fully realized artificial intelligence until they add a subroutine that actively works against the good of the whole. I am a nerd.

You can’t escape Cavedad…

I think of myself as a fairly modern and well-adjusted dad, though it occurs to me that my list of ‘dad behaviours to avoid’ may be based too much on TV and unrealistic scenarios. I grew up during the sensitive 80s, and the message was that real men are now in touch with their emotions and this wasn’t the case before. But there is every chance that there were great, affectionate dads in the 50s and 60s, way more demonstrative than Ward Cleaver. The challenge is to find good, realistic role models to compare yourself to. I’d advise against comparing yourself to anyone, but that’s a part of your normal human development. Just don’t set the bar impossibly high.

Still, no matter how comfortable I am with our current family plan (the wife working and me staying home with the lad), it only takes a whisper of a hint of money troubles to tap into my well of dad guilt. As soon as the prospect of cash getting tight is mentioned, I feel like I am failing to follow one of the dad Prime Directives. (And yes, I understand ‘Prime’ implies a singular directive, mister pickypants. I’m using it in a plural sense anyway, so there.) As a manly man father, I should be earning the big paychecks and buying things for the family. Besides scaring off the ever threatening sabretooth tigers, bringing home the bacon is one of my important duties.

When this money panic sets in, it doesn’t matter that we decided as a family to try this arrangement out, and that I’m working on my writing and seeing real improvement. The man guilt is wired deep down in my perception of gender roles, and it is mighty powerful when triggered.All of the calm rationalization goes out of the window and I enter a state of paralytic guilty terror, which of course keeps me from doing anything productive, and so the shame spiral begins! The notion that I could possibly make a modest living by selling my made-up stories to internet strangers starts to sound pretty crazy and unattainable.

To be honest, I don’t want to go back to a regular job. My last one ground me down and broke my brain, and I’m not jazzed about going back. The real issue, though,  is that I want to keep spending my days with the little dude. The plan, at least in my head, was for me to stay at home with him until he heads off to kindergarten in 16 months. I will go back to some kind of lame part-time night job when we need the cash, but I really don’t want to go back full-time and give up this time at home with my highly excitable, sometimes infuriating, but always entertaining Maxwell.